“California says this chemical causes cancer. So why is it being sprayed into drinking water?”

This blog post is about a cancer causing herbicide called Roundup, made by pharmaceutical giant Monsanto, that is the most popular herbicide on the market today.  The main ingredient in Roundup is glyphosate which was one of the deadly ingredients in Agent Orange used in Vietnam that has and is killing our own troops and veterans today, not to mention the Vietnamese population.  It must be noted that Agent Orange is still causing birth defects and death in Vietnam, that few people know about.

Last year Roundup was added to California’s official list of chemicals known to cause cancer.  The World Health Organization (WHO), has also listed it as a carcinogen, and there are also hundreds of lawsuits across the country by plaintiffs claiming  Roundup has caused them bodily harm.

Yesterday, The Sacramento Bee ran an article stating that “California has put 14,000 gallons of Roundup into the Sacramento River Delta since 2010″.  The purpose is reportedly to kill nonnative aquatic plants that are choking the Delta, and which according to NASA can be seen from space.  The state is blaming the plant for damaging the fish habitat.  Did you catch that?  The state of California is concerned about fish habitat (fish life), but at the same time is poisoning the state’s drinking water with an herbicide that is a known carcinogen!  WHAT THE HELL?!

Officials say the weed-killing program has been approved by a host of state and federal agencies, and that strict limits have been set on the use of Roundup and other herbicides in the West Coast’s largest estuary, which provides drinking water to 25 million Californians. A team of state scientists also monitors the treatment locations and water quality to ensure contamination levels don’t get too high or too close to drinking water intakes and Delta farmland.

“Everybody wants to make sure we’re taking care of the Delta and its natural resources and the drinking water as well,” said Gloria Sandoval, spokeswoman for the Division of Boating and Waterways.

But Roundup’s critics say it’s hypocritical for one state agency to say the herbicide is a likely cancer hazard while another sprays it into a place where drinking water is pulled.

“There is irony in one arm of the state acknowledging that the chemical is cancer causing while the other continues to use thousands of gallons of it in the hub of the state’s drinking water,” said Paul Towers, the Sacramento based organizing director and policy advocate for Pesticide Action Network North America. “At the very least, we need a deep assessment of whether or not the use of Roundup is the appropriate method for controlling or managing these invasive plants.”

I am including an article regarding Monsanto’s Roundup, as well as a Wikipedia article describing the California-San Joaquin River Delta.  This article includes maps, and is important to the understanding of where the water goes:

The Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta, or California Delta, is an expansive inland river delta and estuary in Northern California. The Delta is formed at the western edge of the Central Valley by the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers and lies just east of where the rivers enter Suisun Bay. The Delta is recognized for protection by the California Bays and Estuaries Policy.[1] The city of Stockton is located on the San Joaquin River on the eastern edge of the delta. The total area of the Delta, including both land and water, is about 1,100 square miles (2,800 km2).

So I have put this short, most important article together so that those who don’t know about the poisoning of California’s drinking water will hopefully take action by boycotting Roundup, sharing this post, and speaking out to their legislative representatives.

Ginny Linn

“Revelation” The Movie Contains Truth and Disinformation

The following is a professional video titled “REVOLUTION, Dawn of Global Government”, that contains truth and disinformation.

The video starts out with “free screening” as an introduction to the rest of the video (five parts), describing American ideals and founding; it evokes great emotion, and belief in God.   However, this led me to the importance of knowing the Truth of how this country got started.  With that said, it’s  important to know that the founding of this country was planned way before the first explorer (Christopher Columbus), came over; it was a business enterprise.   Of course we have been trained/taught in school to believe it was Christopher Columbus in 1492, who discovered America.  But is that true?  This video may shed some light on the questionability of that training/teaching; independent thought is what is required, and a questioning mind.

To understand America, one must know that the United States started as a corporation (Virginia Company), and is ending as a corporation registered on Dunn&Bradstreet.  This should lead to questions about the Constitution, and whether or not it was written to fool all those who came before us into thinking this would be nirvana.  We should then question WHO the Founding Fathers were.  The answer is that they were the “enlightened men” of their time; related by blood to a Royal lineage.  The Founding Fathers were of  Merovingian descent:  (“God’s Chosen”).  That is an ancient bloodline that rules the world to this day.  This can be verified by research. They were sent here to colonize, and get things rolling.  They knew EXACTLY what they were doing, and who they were fooling.

America was planned in order to bring in the NWO; nothing short of that. That has been accomplished, and is why America is collapsing now.

We are supposed to be entertained by this video; it does not encourage research, which of course requires reading and time.  It “tells” us what the truth is.

It is indeed already a NWO, and we are already under the strictest of control; America IS a police state (Do you see the cameras everywhere?).  Sadly, there will be no one to save We The People.  Our current downward spiral will play out to the very end.  Yes, indeed, there will be a financial collapse that very, very few are prepared for, or even believe will happen.  Yes, “There’s something wrong, something BAD wrong.” as mentioned in this video.

Furthermore, “Natures Law, God’s law, God’s Moral Law”, mentioned in this video, are NOT what this country was truly founded on.  The Founding Father’s believed in deism – From the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 1969:

The belief, claiming foundation solely upon the evidence of reason, in the existence of God as the creator of the universe who after setting it in motion abandoned it, assumed no control over life, exerted no influence on natural phenomena, and gave no supernatural revelations.

However, the Founding Fathers gave the new country religion in the form of Christianity, in order for The People to be more easily controlled; religion does not encourage free thought; it requires belief in dogma.  They also did not want The People to be enlightened as they were by a Classical education:

…the quadrivium-the classical curriculum-comprises the four liberal arts of number, geometry, music, and cosmology. It was studied from antiquity to the Renaissance as a way of glimpsing the nature of reality. … Google Books .

They were also schooled in the Trivium that came before the Quadrivum, but we were not. WHY would that be?  Because if The People could think critically, and knew the liberal arts, they would not be fooled, and could not be led and controlled by nonsense.

The video is nice entertainment, but you have to be informed enough to read between the lines, and connect dots.



There is an Agenda to turn the world upside down using SEX; pitting straight people against gay people, and vice versa.  It’s been going on for a few decades in the US, but has now taken on a life of its own.

Part of that Agenda is to make both forms of SEX dirty and degenerate, and at the same time pit us all against one another.

Ask yourself WHY there has been such a push for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender lifestyles. Hell, people have been all of those things since the beginning of time.  And, also they only represent a tiny percentage of the population; maybe less than 4%. Yet here we are in the 21st Century, beating one another over the head about it. Making it mandatory to create transgender bathrooms, create a third gender on all employment and medical forms, teaching school children how to have gay sex.  WHAT THE HELL?!

In Truth,  this is an Agenda to turn the world upside down using SEXual orientation; to make it all dirty, and to ultimately cause genocide, and at the same time to drag children into it by way of both straight and gay pedophilia hoping to eventually make it “normal”.

It’s important, however, to go further back than the 21st Century in order to understand what is going on.  In fact, we have to go all the way back to Ancient Egypt, and take a look at the Obelisk which  represents the male penis.

“The Obelisk was called Cleopatra’s Needle and was originally erected in the city of the sun, Heliopolis, about 1500 BC. Sun worship is the worship of regeneration (sex), and worship of the sun god Satan, that are all tied together.” See The Thirteen Bloodlines of the Illuminati by Fritz Springmeier.

Truth be told, it’s really all about sex and the domination by the male.  NOT all males, however, just them:   the “chosen ones”.   PLUS, they don’t like women; women are for procreation ONLY.  Furthermore, if you were to do your research, you would learn that many of those who have ruled the world for thousands of years are actually gay or bisexual.   Don’t believe that?  Consider the backgrounds of many politicians and actors today and yesteryear.

Why do you think California governor, Jerry Brown, wants the teaching of the sexual lifestyles of former public figures to be taught in public schools  in California?  Because he WANTS you to know.  However, he and his puppet masters can’t actually come out and say it; that is, they are gay and proud of it.  That would ruin their fun of watching us ALL tear one another apart over our SEXual orientation.

Finally, you don’t have to take my word for this, you can do your own research, and come to your own conclusions as to why this thing about SEXual orientation has become a Political Agenda, including for innocent children who don’t even know about life yet, let alone sexuality.

“They” Want you Chipped

The “They” in the title are those who rule planet Earth, and “they” want us chipped.  Why?  To control us; to take away our free thought, to take away our freedom of movement, to take away our personal decisions as human beings; to take away our humanity.

Historically, they started with pets; they did that to “gradually” get us accustomed to the concept of micro chipping, by declaring that it will “keep our pets safe”; then they gradually introduced it in places like Disneyland, to “keep our children safe”.  As  you know, it’s always about our “safety”, which of course, it really isn’t.  It is in truth, a diabolical, authoritarian attempt to turn us in to unthinking machines.  Some call it “the mark of the beast”.

It’s being accomplished by what is known as “gradualism” or Fabien Socialism.  Gradualism is the same concept as boiling a live frog in a pot of water in which he is being gradually boiled to death, but doesn’t feel it.  It’s the same with humans, i.e. it’s done so slowly, we don’t even know what’s happening to us.  How could they do it otherwise without us knowing something wicked this way comes?

Now they have come up with the “Smartwatch”, which allows it’s wearers to tap into their bank accounts.  There is also the more expensive Apple Pay Watch that allows higher end store clerks at stores like Whole Foods to swipe your watch to pay for your purchases.

These devices will eventually make debit cards obsolete, and they are the precursor to the human chip; you know, “gradualism”.

What prompted me to write about this issue was a recent visit to my dermatologist.   I was sitting in the waiting area with four other people.  They were all of Baby Boomer age; three women, and one man.  All overweight, I might add.  There was a discussion going on about how their plastic Medicare cards were being recalled and new paper cards issued.  Not all had received their new cards.

One of these women mentioned that soon they would not need a card as everyone was going to be chipped.  The other two women chimed in stating that they knew that, and that some companies were requiring their employees to be chipped.  I chimed in, and said that it was not a good idea, as in time if you did something wrong your chip could be turned off.  They seem unfazed by that.  The man, however, looked up from his cell phone, and nodded in agreement.  I then asked if they had read or seen George Orwell’s “1984”; the man again indicated yes.

So to come to my point of all this, and to conclude, what I found the most frightening of all regarding this conversation about chipping was the fact that they all would willingly go along with it, and they were all old enough to know better.

So the deed has been done.  Even the older population, for the most part, has accept this.  Why?  I think mostly because of convenience or better put laziness.  They won’t even have to go to the trouble of pulling a card from their wallets.  It’s a dumbed down, lazy population that is going to the chopping block, or should we call it the chipping block.










What is Happening Today and Why

This will be a short one with a long quote.  It is about America, and all who live here. Even though it quotes the Bible, it is not meant to be religious (the Bible was written by mortal men containing truth, half truth, and lies); it is about the truth of where we are, how we got here, what we have become, and where we are going.

Americans and most in the Western world have sold they’re souls to Lucifer, by putting “things” before substance, before our humanity. And, that is why we are going down. We have lost our way. Anyone with eyes can see it if they want to.

Maybe we think about this as we celebrate a fake country, and fake freedom.   That’s a topic for another time.

Revelation 18:11-13 New King James Version (NKJV)

11 “And the merchants of the earth will weep and mourn over her, for no one buys their merchandise anymore: 12 merchandise of gold and silver, precious stones and pearls, fine linen and purple, silk and scarlet, every kind of citron wood, every kind of object of ivory, every kind of object of most precious wood, bronze, iron, and marble; 13 and cinnamon and incense, fragrant oil and frankincense, wine and oil, fine flour and wheat, cattle and sheep, horses and chariots, and bodies and souls of men.

There are three divisions to Babylon: Ecclesiastical or Religious (Spiritual) Babylon; Political or Governmental Babylon; and Commercial or Economic Babylon. Throughout history all three of these portrayals of Babylon have reared its ugly head and manifested the spirit of seduction and deceit. They have denigrated God and His church. They have stepped on biblical precepts and counsel, and sought to put humanism on the throne where God Almighty only should reign. They have in effect built a tower of Babel, religiously, politically, and economically, and have bombarded the very gate of Heaven, seeking entrance to overthrow the Omnipotent Creator. They have placed more esteem upon the creation rather than the One Who created them. In effect, they have said as their predecessor Lucifer, “I will be like the Most High!” Furthermore, they have sought to enslave by seduction all who will follow them, hunting and entrapping souls with religious compromise, political expediency, and financial dishonesty with debt laden snares. The enslavement continues – but not for much longer.

Yet, God shall have the final word, and victory. Revelation 18:11-13 shows the demise of that great Babylonian merchandiser of men’s souls, “And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more: The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, and of pearls, and fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet, and all thyine wood, and all manner vessels of ivory, and all manner vessels of most precious wood, and of brass, and iron, and marble, And cinnamon, and odours, and ointments, and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.”

Galations 6:7 proclaims, “Be not deceived; God is not mocked…” Babylon’s judgment shall be complete as Revelation 18:2 says, “Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen.” She will not get up again! Note Revelation 18:14, “…and thou shalt find them no more at all.”

Many who enjoyed the profits of her influence will weep because of her destruction, “For in one hour so great riches is come to nought. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off, and cried when they saw the smoke of her burning, saying, What city is like unto this great city! and they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas, that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.” (Rev. 18:17-19).

And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all.”

The Spirit of Nimrod (Mystery, Babylon)
Revelation 17:5, “And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.”

The Tower of Babel

The First World is Becoming the Third World

I do believe there is much truth to the meme below. Third World countries are far different from First World countries. Even the hygiene is different, as well as how Third Worlders value life. They have not evolved over thousands of years like the White race, which dominates the First World.

The whole point of taking out the Western economy (White middle class), is to cause Whites to stop procreating which amounts to genocide.
We are now entering “The Mad Max World” without the nuclear devastation which is not necessary, as we are pitted against one another.

Please check back and visit my blog from time to time; you never know what kind of mind blowing Truth you might find there.

California’s Man Made Drought Means Orwellian Water Rationing

East Area Rapist – Attack #21 and The Sacramento District Attorney’s Office

On May 17, 1977, my husband and I, his girls, and our baby lived around the corner from the 21st East Area Rapist victims.

My middle step-daughter babysat for them on a regular basis.  My stepdaughter told me before it happened, that the woman was terrified of being one of his victims; as if she sensed it.

Once I was over to the house in question when my stepdaughter was babysitting (I don’t remember why).  I noticed that the front door had numerous deadbolts. The house butted up to the levee along the American River in Carmichael on Sandbar Circle (we lived on the corner on McClaren Drive).

On this night, my husband and I had visited some friends.  While there we discussed the East Area Rapist (it was a terrifying time, and a topic of conversation for many).  We got home around 10 pm.  I remember feeling strange, as if he was around.  I couldn’t wait to get into the house.  It should be noted that we had booby trapped our staircase; my former brother-in-law even talked about staking himself out on the roof to watch for the Rapist.  That’s how great the fear was in our house.

Later that night around the time of the incident, I was up with my two-month old baby.  I remember hearing voices, so I looked out the window of the middle, upstairs bedroom.  I saw swarms of men in suits all over the the house in question and in the street.  Soon, someone knocked on our front door.  It was two plain, clothed detectives canvasing the neighborhood.  That’s when I learned that the East Area Rapist WAS around when I got out of the car earlier!  My instincts were correct.

The next day I learned that the Rapist threatened to kill his next victims (I had heard he was going to mutilate them).  I was so terrified for me and my baby that I booked a flight to my brother’s house in Southern California, and stayed a few days to calm down.

So to get on with this, the following is an account of the attack on the 21st victim of the East Area Rapist, on 5-17-77. It is so graphic, and so full of information that I have spent all these years wondering about.  It’s terrifying to read.
Finally, always keep your doors, windows, and gates locked, because you never know who might be lurking.  This is not meant to cause fear, but to encourage precautions, and to ALWAYS listen to your instincts.

NOTE:  I do not believe the guy they have in custody is the REAL East Area Rapist, but a patsy to boost Sacramento District Attorney Anne Marie Schubert’s political chances:

“I think Schubert is using this to advance her flagging campaign for re-election.  She has taken serious heat for not filing charges against the 2 officers who shot Clark.  Front and center now, she is capitalizing on this arrest and appears to be taking credit for “her team” who arrested him.  Just another smoke screen . . .”

“But there is a lot that does not appear to match this
suspect.  I have followed this case for a number of years
and watched and read all the forensics that were being built
to try and identify this guy.  First, two women who
survived identified him as having blond hair and blue
eyes.  Second, the latest forensic info that came out by
the FBI about a year ago was that certain commercial paint
debris was collected at one of the crime scenes and could
only have come from someone in the construction trade.
That fits perfectly the killers operating procedures.  A
construction worker of an advanced level moved around
California in all the areas where his crimes have been
linked through DNA.  Santa Barbara, Orange County, Bay
Area, and of course our region.  And a construction worker
stays enough time in different areas to do the stake out and
stalking that this guy did before committing his actual
crimes.  This guy they got now worked for 27 years at a
SaveMart Distribution Center.  In order for him to fit the
crimes he must have continually relocated to all the areas
where his crimes occurred for significant periods of time so
he could plan and execute his actions.  Whoever did these
crimes was very methodical and well planned and did not act
on impulse.  And the guy they got now was married with 2
children, does not fit the MO.  I am concerned that they
are going to pin it on him so they can say they finally
caught him  by planting evidence.”

So now the Powers That Be have another patsy to cover their lies, misdeeds, and inadequacies.  And guess what, MANY people are thinking the same thing, i.e. framed.  Remember, this guy was arrested on National DNA Day, and supposedly caught by a DNA test a relative took on Ancestry.com.   That in and of itself, should speak volumes to anyone with an ability to critically think.


I just read “Constitutionalism”:  The White Man’s Ghost Dance, and would like to express myself on the subject, and cite some cases I am familiar with that pertain to the same basic subject.

I know a couple of people who each have their own legal cases.  One is suing the City, including Jerry Brown (a Jesuit).  This is being done in pro per for now, using Common Law pleadings that invoke God, and the Court does not understand.

The other wants to sue an international accounting firm for destroying his business in 1997, after he had gone Public, and the firm had made errors on company’s actual worth.  So the State shut him down.

He consequently sued in Court, and lost his case in 2000.  He now wants to do a Common Law Court of Record, and has spent the last five months, sequestered in his house, learning all he can about Common Law Court of Record; he’s also a champion of the Magna Carta.  He even purchased Bill Thornton’s videos, and communicated with him via email (I read the email), but Thornton refused to cite ANY cases he has ever won.  Hmm.

I also know two other people who declared themselves sovereign citizens, and continued to drive their automobiles without a license or registration.  Both had their autos confiscated, and sold at auction.  One rides a bicycle now.

What these people don’t understand, and what I’ve learned, is that the Roman Vatican laws rule.  The Roman Vatican laws are a part of the ROOT of evil that rules the world; make no mistake about that.  The ROOT is the cause of all evil in the world, and has ruled for thousands years.

Finally, no man, or woman will be really FREE until that ROOT is dead.  You can take that to the bank, which you had better hurry and do before that ROOT collapses the financial system as well.


Constitutionalists revere the Magna Carta, but if they were to read it, they’d be baffled. Expecting to find, as libertarian Constitutionalist Ken Krawchuk says, “many of the rights we still enjoy today,” they’d find themselves adrift in an alien, feudal world of “aids,” “wardship,” “scutage,” “knight service,” “reliefs,” “wainage,” “castle guard,” “socage,” “burgage,” and other arcana even medievalists toil to comprehend.

Magna Carta — extorted from King John by a few dozen rebellious barons in 1215, a dead letter within three months, voided by England’s feudal overlord, the Pope — did almost nothing for almost all of England’s two million people. It confirmed or created privileges for churchmen and barons, occasionally for knights, and in only two instances for “free men.” Most Englishmen were villeins, not freemen. And as historian Sidney Painter has written, “Whenever provisions of the Charter seem to benefit the ordinary man, a close examination will show that it is his lord’s pocketbook that is the real cause of concern.” It was only a question of who would do the fleecing.

The Great Charter has nothing to say about free speech, unreasonable searches and seizures, self-incrimination, the right to bear arms, free exercise of religion, the obligation of contracts, ex post facto laws, bills of attainder, rights of petition and assembly, excessive bail, the right to counsel, cruel and unusual punishments, indictment by grand jury, etc., etc. Far from forbidding even involuntary servitude, it presupposes it (chs. 17, 20 and 23). Far from forbidding the establishment of religion, it confirms it in its very first provision (ch. 1).

The real Magna Carta was not even remotely libertarian. Modern libertarian notions such as self-ownership, laissez faire, greatest equal liberty, the nightwatchman (minimal) state, even private property itself would have bewildered the signatories of Magna Carta. They understood liberties, not liberty; privileges, not property. The free market was a concept of the far future: “markets” were times and places where the government authorized buying and selling. Property rights were derivative and relative. Except for the king, nobody owned real property “allodially,” absolutely. Rather, title (ownership) was relative to other interests, and in theory always subordinate to the paramount claims of the king. Constitutionalists disparage legislation, but that’s all Magna Carta ever was, amendable and repealable like any other statute. By 1992, only three of its 63 provisions were still on the books.

In the guise of declaring custom, Magna Carta changed the law, violating what Constitutionalists consider the Common Law. They cherish the county, for instance, to which the sheriff was answerable (they suppose) — but the Charter forbid sheriffs and other local officials from hearing the pleas of the Crown (ch. 24). It is as if the President of the United States issued an executive order that felonies should be tried only in federal courts!

As for this Common Law (cue the angelic chorus here), just what is it anyway? The term has at least a half dozen meanings. It might refer to English law as distinguished from the civil-law systems of Europe. It might be “law” as distinguished from “equity,” i.e., the law of the royal courts at Westminster distinguished from certain doctrines and remedies administered by a different royal appointee, the Chancellor. It might refer to judge-made rather than statutory law. Perhaps most often it refers to the law “common” to all Englishmen, the national law as opposed to the varied local laws enforced by manor and hundred courts, borough courts, and courts leet. Ironically, if there was ever a trace of truth to the Constitutionalist dogma that the people in juries “judged the facts and the law,” it was in the local courts outside the Common Law. And it was the law of these courts with which ordinary Englishmen were most familiar and which, as Julius Goebel argued, most heavily influenced colonial American law.

As if “Common Law” were not a phrase already overburdened with meanings, Constitutionalists load on even more. They equate Common Law with Natural Law, with Natural Reason, with Christianity, and with common sense. Ken Krawchuk’s example is common-law marriage: “If a guy and girl live together for seven years, they’re married; it’s the common law. It’s plain common sense.” It’s neither. Mere cohabitation for however long a period never married anyone in England or America. There was no such thing as nonceremonial “common law” marriage in England at all. In America, where the practice developed, such a marriage required — not just shacking up — but also an agreement to marry and a public reputation for being married and/or the couple holding itself out as being married. The seven-year proviso is imaginary, and it isn’t common sense either. Why not six years and eleven months? Why not five years? A lot of legally solemnized marriages don’t last that long these days. Since when was common sense so dogmatic?

Constitutionalists contend that the Common Law is based on (litigation over) real property — land. As their generalizations go, this one is not too far wrong, but it isn’t easy to square it with a conception of the Common Law as universal Reason. Under Common Law, real property descended to the oldest male heir — except in Kent, where partible inheritance among male issue prevailed, with the proviso that the youngest son inherited the household (“gavelkind”). Nowhere did land descend to any female if there lived a male heir, however remote the relationship. How is it that primogeniture is common sense everywhere in England except Kent?